Multiparty monitoring requires people with varied backgrounds and interests to work together to better understand and measure project impacts and results. A multiparty effort can develop an agreed-upon, comprehensive list of monitoring issues and questions; assess how well a project is meeting desired outcomes;identify how management can be adapted to improve results; and increase understanding among diverse interests.

Not finding what you need? Visit our Collaboration Tools Search to see all tools and resources.

With support from the Forest Service Collaborative Forest Restoration Program and the Ford Foundation, the National Forest Foundation (NFF) facilitated a diverse effort to develop a series of handbooks on multiparty monitoring, written by the Northern Arizona University Ecological Restoration Institute. Please see the many other links on this page offered as references and examples.

Multiparty Monitoring Plans

In order to be successful, multiparty monitoring groups must identify and agree upon what they will monitor, how data will be collected, and how it will be analyzed. Often groups jointly create monitoring protocols, though sometimes one or more trusted scientists are called in to create the plan for data collection. While some groups collect their data by sending out teams with balanced representation from the diverse interests involved, others develop objective and repeatable protocols for data collection that are easily collected by anyone in an unbiased manner.

Once the protocols are agreed upon, data can be gathered by a subset of the multiparty monitoring group, volunteers or students. Often groups use photo points to show change over time. The key is that the diverse interests involved in the multiparty monitoring effort agree on the plan, data collection protocols, analysis, and follow-up actions to what has been learned.

Posting Monitoring Data on the Web

Many partners of the NFF are engaged in multiparty monitoring of projects on their local National Forests and have developed Web sites and protocols that may be helpful to others. This is just a short list – please contact us if you are looking for a specific example.

  • The Clackamas Stewardship Partners are working on a variety of monitoring projects on the Mt. Hood National Forest in Washington.
  • The Tushar Allotments Collaborative was a two-year effort, started in 2007, to collaboratively resolve resource management disputes on two grazing allotments in the Tushar Range of the Fishlake National Forest in Utah. Their website offers descriptions of monitoring protocols and data collection sheets.
  • Lake County Resources Initiative engages local high school students in monitoring restoration activities occurring on the Upper Chewaucan Watershed, which includes both private lands and the Fremont-Winema National Forests.
  • The Diablo Trust has developed a centralized monitoring database based on the Holistic Ecosystem Health Indicator, a collaboratively-developed, integrated monitoring framework.